Implementation of the 7E Learning Cycle in Mathematics Instruction in Echague Public Secondary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65141/sjter.v3i1n5Keywords:
7E Learning Cycle, Mathematics Instruction, Teaching Strategies, Secondary Education, Instructional PracticesAbstract
This study examined the perceived level of implementation of the 7E Learning Cycle in Mathematics instruction among public secondary school teachers in Echague, Isabela. Specifically, it described the profile of the respondents in terms of age, sex, highest educational attainment, years of teaching experience, and relevant trainings and seminars attended. It also examined the perceived level of implementation across the seven phases: Elicit, Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluate, and Extend, and determined whether overall implementation differed when grouped according to respondents' profiles. A descriptive-comparative research design was utilized, involving 47 Mathematics teachers. Data were gathered using an adapted survey questionnaire and analyzed using frequency, percentage, weighted mean, independent samples t-test, and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Findings revealed that the 7E Learning Cycle was perceived as very highly implemented across all phases. Overall scale-level comparisons showed no significant differences when grouped according to age, sex, highest educational attainment, years of teaching experience, and relevant trainings and seminars attended. However, selected item-level indicators showed differences, suggesting that while the overall pattern of implementation was generally consistent, some specific teaching practices may still need focused support. The study concludes that teachers perceived themselves as consistently implementing the 7E Learning Cycle in Mathematics instruction. It is recommended that teachers sustain the use of the model and further strengthen strategies that promote exploration, questioning, higher-order thinking, and student engagement.
Downloads
References
Amirova, N. (2025). Traditional vs. Non-Traditional Teaching in Secondary Education: A Comparative Analysis. Porta Universorum, 1(3), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.010309
Department of Education. (2016, June 17). DO 42, s. 2016: Policy guidelines on daily lesson preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. Department of Education.
Department of Education. (2019, August 22). DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2019: Policy guidelines on the K to 12 Basic Education Program. Department of Education.
Hernández Gómez, F. J., & Hernández Castillo, T. (2026). Integration of academic posters as an active learning strategy in mathematics. International Journal of Systems Science and Applied Mathematics, 11(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijssam.20261101.12
Mekonnen, Z. B., Yehualaw, D. D., Mengistie, S. M., & Mersha, B. S. (2024). The effect of 7E learning cycle enriched with computer animations on students’ conceptual understanding and overcoming misconceptions. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 325–356.
Pedler, M. Yeigh, T, & Hudson, S. (2020). The teachers' role in student engagement: A review. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (3) (2020), pp. 48-62, 10.14221/ajte.2020v45n3.4
Skilling K, Bobis J, Martin AJ. (2021). The “ins and outs” of student engagement in mathematics: Shifts in engagement factors among high and low achievers. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2021;33(3):469–493. doi: 10.1007/s13394-020-00313-2