Bridging the Mathematics Learning Crisis in Philippine Basic Education: Evidence-Based Policy Directions for Improving Numeracy and Mathematical Proficiency
Keywords:
Mathematics, Basic Education, International Assessment, Mathematics Proficiency, NumeracyAbstract
The ability to think mathematically has become a fundamental competency in the 21st century. Beyond performing numerical computations, mathematics literacy enables individuals to think critically, solve complex problems, make informed decisions, and participate productively in today’s data-driven societies. The role of mathematics is also indispensable as it cultivates critical thinking, logical reasoning, problem-solving, and analytical thinking skills—all crucial for keeping pace with technological advancements and dynamic societal changes. Being an interdisciplinary field, mathematics intersects with other disciplines such as in Data Science, Economics, Engineering, Natural Sciences, Computer Science, and Environmental Science, among others. As such, building mathematics competencies ensures that learners can apply mathematical reasoning and skills in academic pursuits, workplace demands, and lifelong learning, which eventually enable them to contribute meaningfully to national development.
In the Philippines, however, mathematics education continues to face significant and persistent challenges. Previous reports from different international large-scale assessments have drawn attention to the country’s dismal performance in mathematics. These results have raised serious issues regarding the quality of instruction and the effectiveness of the instructional practices and curriculum implementation within the country’s basic education sector.
This policy brief argues that improving mathematics learning outcomes in Philippine Basic Education demands a shift from fragmented interventions toward an evidence-based strategy that prioritizes foundational numeracy, strengthens quality of instruction, and promotes equitable access to learning opportunities.
References
Baluyot, L. (2026). Challenges and Triumphs in the ARAL Program: A Phenomenological Inquiry Among Public School Teachers. International Journal of Research in Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.65138/ijris.2026.v4i6.311
Braak, D., Lenes, R., Purpura, D. J., Schmitt, S. A., & Størksen, I. (2022). Why do early mathematics skills predict later mathematics and reading achievement? The role of executive function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 214, 105306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105306
Department of Education (2025). DepEd Order No. 018, s. 2025: Implementing guidelines of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning Program
Department of Education. (2024b). MATATAG Curriculum. Department of Education.
Hattie, J., Fisher, D., Frey, N., Gojak, L. M., Moore, S. D., & Mellman, W. (2016). Visible learning for mathematics, grades K-12: What works best to optimize student learning. Corwin Press.
Ladd, H. F., & Sorensen, L. C. (2014). Returns to teacher experience: Student achievement and motivation in middle school. Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 241–279. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00194
Mousse, A., Abdo, M., Hunduma, C. M., & Tezera, D. (2026). The influence of socioeconomic status on students' mathematics achievement in secondary schools in Borama District, Somaliland. Discover Education, 5, Article 466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-00685-z
Ndelale, I., Gordon, J. F., Appiagyei, E., & Akendita, P. A. (2025). Family and teacher predictors of mathematics achievement in senior high school students: Evidence from SEM. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202533190
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023a). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023b). PISA 2022 country note: Philippines. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023c). PISA 2022 results (Volume II): Learning during—and from—disruption. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Education at a glance 2025: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2026). OECD economic surveys: Philippines 2026. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-economic-surveys-philippines-2026_f0e0c581-en.html
Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (2017). Teacher Development Needs Study (TDNS): Findings and Recommendations. Policy Note.
Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality. (2017). Teacher development needs study: Findings and Recommendations. Philippine Normal University & University of New England. https://www.ritq.ph/files/policy-notes/No.2017-001.pdf
Second Congressional Commission on Education. (2024). Miseducation: The failed system of Philippine education (Year One Report). https://edcom2.gov.ph/publications/year1report/
Second Congressional Commission on Education. (2025). Fixing the foundations: A matter of national survival (Year Two Report). https://edcom2.gov.ph/publications/year2report/
Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization & United Nations Children's Fund. (2024). SEA-PLM 2024 main regional report. SEA-PLM Secretariat.
Villon, J., & Balagtas, M. (2023). Instructional Practices of Filipino Teachers Implementing Philippine and Singapore Elementary. Journal of Educational and Human Resource Mathematics Curricula Development, 11:58-75. https://doi.org/10.61569/pecryb33
